Relationship between clinician assessment and self-assessment of personality disorders using the SWAP-200 and PAI.

نویسندگان

  • Rebekah Bradley
  • Mark Hilsenroth
  • Clifford Guarnaccia
  • Drew Westen
چکیده

The relation between self- and peer-informant reports of personality using psychometric instruments has been the focus of considerable research. The quantified judgments of clinically experienced observers such as treating clinicians have also been studied. The focus of the present article is on the measurement of 3 personality disorders (borderline, antisocial, and obsessive-compulsive) using the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP-200), an instrument designed to quantify personality ratings made by clinically experienced informants, and the self-report Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). SWAP-200 personality disorder scales showed small to medium correlations with borderline and antisocial personality disorder scales from the PAI. As predicted, SWAP-200 obsessive-compulsive personality disorder correlated negatively with these scales, suggesting discriminant validity.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Clinician reports of personality pathology of patients beginning and patients ending psychoanalysis.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this work was to use a clinician Q-sort procedure to describe the personality pathology and adaptive functioning of patients beginning and ending psychoanalysis. DESIGN With a cross-sectional design, we compared a group of patients beginning and a group of patients ending psychoanalysis. METHODS Twenty-six psychoanalysts described a patient beginning psychoanalysis...

متن کامل

Revising and assessing axis II, Part I: developing a clinically and empirically valid assessment method.

OBJECTIVE Personality pathology is difficult to measure. Current instruments have problems with validity and rely on a direct-question format that may be inappropriate for the assessment of personality. In addition, they are designed specifically to address current DSM-IV categories and criteria, which limits their utility in making meaningful revisions of those criteria. These problems suggest...

متن کامل

Comparison of Personality substraits between Individuals with Suicide Attempt and Suicide Ideation based on SWAP-200

  Background: Suicide ideation and attempts are among common clinical problems that burden many costs to societies. This study was conducted to compare personality substraits among individuals with suicide ideation and suicide attempts. methods: A descriptive research method with expose-facto design was chosen. The population was including all clients who referred to Damghan velayat hospital ...

متن کامل

Clinical assessment of pathological personality traits.

OBJECTIVE Research has raised questions about the ability of clinicians to make reliable diagnostic judgments about personality. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the dimensional diagnosis of pathological personality traits with the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure-200 (SWAP-200) Q sort. METHOD Two clinician/judges independently described 24 outpatients us...

متن کامل

Diagnostic Agreement Between Clinicians and Clients: The Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the SWAP-200 and MCMI-III Personality Disorder Scales.

A particularly controversial aspect in the field of personality assessment is the use of self-report measures, versus clinicians' evaluations, for diagnosing personality disorder (PD). No studies have systematically documented the agreement between these sources for the entire array of DSM-5 PDs using comprehensive measures and experienced clinicians' judgments. The present work fills this gap ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Psychological assessment

دوره 19 2  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007